136 BT – Item 2.7.5 Feedback related to Dl 35/032 (Protection against lightning: EN 62305 - NF C 17- 102)

| Kategorie: Firemní tiskovina  |

Vydal: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví Autor: CENELEC 136 BT

Strana 6 z 25

Vámi hledaný text obsahuje tato stránku dokumentu který není autorem určen k veřejnému šíření.

Jak získat tento dokument?






Poznámky redaktora
2.1; The Clause 3.2.2.2.3.4.2, page (see Annex B) The specification for the necessary safety distance conflict with the requirements specified EN 62305 (see 62305-3, clause 6.2); Clause 4.5 requirements for positioning air-termination system are essential conflict with those EN Standard (see 62305-3, clause 5. See particular Clause “METHODE SELECTION NIVEAU PROTECTION”, page 39, Tableau “Determination besoin protection niveau protection” block number 5 (see Annex B).2 and Table 6); - sub-clause 2.3.4).4); - sub-clause 2.1.2) 17-102: detailed comments related principal conflicting clearer: Avant-Propos (see Annex B).4.2.2); Annex page 31 The protection model used determine the protected area direct and serious conflict with the correct use the electro geometrical model used standard (see 62305-1,clause A.4. The requirement minimum total length the earth termination system conflicting with requirements standard (see 62305-3, clause 5.2.2. See also the comments above under sub-clause 2.3); The conflict evident the text the Subclause 2.2 and Annex A); requirements for positioning air termination system tall structures are entirely disregarded (see EN 62305-3, clause 5. See also comment Annexe 17-102.2, page 33, and its Figures (see Annex contrast with because introduce a distance that not considered 62305.1 “Zone protégée”, page 11, where the Figures 2. The arrangement type which shall preferential for lightning protection, has been entirely disregarded (see 62305-3, clause 5.1 points out the difference with the protected zone valutated 62305-3.2. Clause 2.2.2.3. Annex page 34 The method used for risk evaluation and selection protection level LPS (LPL) conflict with EN 62305-2. See also comment Subclause 2.2. - sub-clause 2.3, page (see Annex B) positioning criteria air termination system conflict with the requirements standard (see EN 62305-3, clause 5.1, page 10-11 (see Annex B) the model used determine the protected area conflict with the correct use the electro- geometrical model and used standard (see 62305-1,clause A.1.6.2.4 dimensions the rod are contradiction with those Standard (see 62305-3, clause 5.2.3.2 and Annex 5.1); Clause 4. 5 . Requirements the length earth electrodes don’t comply with requirements standard for type earth arrangement (see EN62305-3, clause 5.3. Provisions types and selection earth electrodes and their arrangements are not accordance with those 62305.4); - Clause 3.2.2 The air termination system the 17-102 standard remains essential conflict with the air termination systems the Standard, because: - sub-clause 2.1.2.3, Table 10, page 63); Clause 4