L.K.668; and Open
Door; TAE Elliot, March 1894, 931030, 109; TAE to
E.
44) Dickson’s version his Century magazine article. The amount work
done the lab declined significantly during the 1893/1894
depression.
43) This recollection from Albert Smith, Reels and Crank
(New York: Doubleday, 1952), cited Hendrick’s Motion Picture
Myth, 171.
41) Brown’s testimony Edison American Mutascope Co,
Complainants record, 143, 173.
45) Terry Ramseye, Million and One Nights (New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1926), 68. Research expenditure for
1893 probably did not excede $25,000— much less than the
$75,000-$80,000 p.
39) ’
’
Some Facts relating Moving Photography" W.
40) Brief Epitany (Sic— this could "Epitamy") all
Facts relating . 147).
46) Patent 589,168, filed Aug 1891.377.a. Total cost the months work was $2883, which
GE paid $911. Lewie, March 1894, 931030, 98.
37) Edison Caveats motion pictures are the appendix of
Hendricks, Motion Picture Myth; Dickson’s article Century
Magazine, 48, June 1894..2. range the beginning the decade. Edison cleaned up
his affairs 1894, withdrawing from many honorary posts and
cutting back his personal expenditures. Billbook #12, 469.
Dickson, Box D.
Dickson, April 1928, Motion picture; Edison caveat.H.Invention the Kinetograph" W.
.-46
36) Tate Van Dyck, Feb 1894, 930808, p.K.
38) Electrical World.
48) Electrical Engineer, 18, nov 1894, p. L..
47) Description kinetograph Dickson Century Magazine, and
Dickson Meadowcroft, May 1921, Biog files. During one month 1894 (May), the labor cost for
work done the phonograph was less than $100, Edison’s
personal experiments cost $460 and ore milling labor cost was
over $1000. VII Jan 1886, 26; experiments are
in Notebook 871210.
42) The history the celluloid film strip told Reese V
Jenkins, Images and Enterprise (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press,
1975), chap Eastman set laboratory 1890, its purpose
was testing, (p
