NOTES
1) Vanderbilt, Edison the Chemist, pp. The Works wanted this project finished the
shortest possible time, but the laboratory did not share this
concern for haste and there were many delays.3
cooperation between the lab and the Machine Works." The essence the problem was that there
was union interest between the lab and the Works. 78-81. The
results then had sent the lab for another round of
experimentation.
2) Kruesi TAE, Aug 1887, Kruesi Collection, 6192
3) Insull Tate, July 1888, 1888 Electricity.
.
5) Insull TAE, May 1888, ibid. The
former acted like independent laboratory despite efforts to
produce more "businesslike" approach contract research. Once new
material was developed the lab, was coated onto wires at
the Works and then tested under operational conditions. As
Edison's laboratory was not going dictated a
group Works engineers and ignorant businessmen.
4) Insull Tate, June 1888, ibid.
The frustration the Works evident Insull's
complaint Edison: "we have spent great deal money on
experimental work insulation and ought getting some
C
result out it
