FACE #96-NJ-042-01 Electrical Testing Laboratory Technician Killed After Contacting 26,000 Volts and Falling

| Kategorie: Firemní tiskovina  | Tento dokument chci!

Vydal: Neurčeno Autor: New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services

Strana 5 z 7

Vámi hledaný text obsahuje tato stránku dokumentu který není autorem určen k veřejnému šíření.

Jak získat tento dokument?






Poznámky redaktora
should noted that the locking out and tagging electrical circuits required under the OSHA standard CFR 1910. FACE recommends that all employees should throughly trained electrical safety before being permitted work the testing areas. Discussion: this situation, the victim’s failure deenergize the power suggests lack of understanding the dangers live electrical circuits. this situation, the employee was able reach the cables without entering the fenced area, essentially bypassing the interlock system. Discussion: The laboratory’s electrical safety interlock system consisted household extension cords stretched across the doorways. Recommendation #2: Employers should develop, implement, and enforce electrical lock- out/ tag-out program.333. FACE recommends that the employer install a hardwired interlock system activated switch installed directly the doors.4 RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS Recommendation #1: Employees must throughly trained the safe handling electrical circuits. Although effective, this system may fail the light gauge cords are damaged. locking system that prevents the doors from being opened until the power disconnected also recommended. Electrical safety training required under the OSHA standard CFR 1910. Employees should receive basic electrical safety training, including how recognize energized circuits and the proper method deenergize the circuit (see recommendation #2). Employees authorized work live electrical circuits should receive additional training. Discussion: The laboratory did not have lock-out/tag-out program for safely deenergizing the experiments. Their practice was shut down the power activating the safety interlocks, leaving potential hazard the interlock malfunctioned another worker inadvertently reconnected it. The system could also easily bypassed using another extension cord to bridge the gap after the door opened.332. . The FACE program recommends that the employer immediately implement effective electrical lock out, tag-out program that includes deenergizing and locking out all circuits the breaker box. This type system may permit the installation emergency power shut down buttons connected into the interlocks. These procedures should be in writing and made part the employee’s training program. Recommendation #3: The laboratory should consider redesigning the electrical safety interlock system